The 36th Annual Notre Dame Student Film Festival, January 24-26th, 2025

I've been covering the Notre Dame Student Festival on and off since 2014. Below are the highlights along with favorable ratings. Of note: this is the first time I voted on the potential winners.  

Try Again * * * Stars

-Imagine Christopher Nolan on holiday, making something low budget and without a script. That's the gist of Try Again, a savage, dark, total mindf*ck of a short film. Requires multiple viewings to figure out the whole kit and caboodle (as only Nolan himself would have it). 

Mazi Remastered * * * Stars

-As something about a DJ from the South Side of Chicago, Mazi Remastered is a laid back, swiftly edited docu in which the funky beats dictate the rhythms of the digital underground subjects (pun intended). Mazi, well he seems like a cocksure guy who never feels like he's worked a day in his life. Hey, he gets away with it. 

Veritas * * * * Stars

 

-Made by what looks like an expert, student filmmaker, Veritas for me is this year's best entry in ND's 2025 festival. It's about Catholic nuns named the Dominican Sisters who teach at a school in Northern Kentucky. A rack focus here, a close-up there, the camera peeking in everywhere, Veritas has its vassals not really knowing they're being filmed. Opaque and quietly powerful stuff.

You Are Home * * * * Stars

-Melissa Cook was a Notre Dame softball player who died tragically in a scaffolding accident via the city of Chicago. A stadium was named after her in the documentary, You Are Home. Hey, this is more than just a lamenting docu mind you, this is veridical realism. Unfolds like a sledgehammer, packs an emotional wallop.  

Footprints of Glory * * * Stars

-An expeditious, cross-cut-type short about diving and possible soon-to-be Olympic dreams, Footprints of Glory is just over four minutes but carries a hint of pure ebullience. Oh and like all great pics, the music is everything, well pretty much everything.

Written by Jesse Burleson

One of Them Days 2025 * * 1/2 Stars

"THAT A GIRL GOES THROUGH"

What I learned from 2025's One of Them Days, is that its diegesis is somewhat pukka. I mean you have two roommates who have one full, 1st of the month to come up with the rent money (and other life-threatening monies) or they'll be on the street or worse yet, dead. "Days", well it stars Keke Palmer and SZA, two actresses who exhibit a ton of get-up-and-go as tenants Dreux and Alyssa. "You lucky she holding me back!" Hex yeah.

Anyhow One of Them Days is like a female version of Friday or a female, farce version of say 2001's Training Day. It's in the look and feel as tar-pitted LA takes center stage with Ghetto Birds, pigeons, and split rims all intact. 

So yeah, everything in "Days" happens in almost 24 hours (hence the title) and there are plenty of high jinks and uncertain hazards along the way. I mean for nearly 97 minutes we watch Dreux and Alyssa try to come up with $1500 bones (which eventually elevates to over six grand) and it becomes rather vexing and um, frustrating. Yup, it's not easy when you have to deal with a cheating broke boyfriend, a lady thug with reprisal on her mind, King Lolo the drug lord, and "Biscuit Bandit" trying to thwart the operation (don't ask). "I just wanna be all alone, and you think I treat you wrong". Sing it Monica! Sing it girl!

Hit ditties and yeasty, pastry robbers aside, One of Them Days is billed as a comedy but you hardly guffaw, probably because the characters and sitches in it feel lifted from other flicks of the same nature (ever seen anything directed by Rick Famuyiwa, Steve Carr, and/or John Singleton? Exactly). It's not a bad pic but I don't see a stoner cult following or repeated viewings in the near future. "Days" gone by.   

Written by Jesse Burleson

Back in Action 2025 * * 1/2 Stars

ACTION MANAGEMENT

Two CIA agents who happened to be romantically involved, leave the life only to be pulled back in after a YouTube video of them beating up some ruffians at a club surfaces over a decade later. That's the rub of 2025's Back in Action, a vehicle so carefree and lightheartedly savage, it might qualify as a cinematic gainsay. 

Anyway I'm a sucker for movies where bone-crunching fight sequences and taekwondo aptitude rule the roost. With "Action", there are plenty of both, filmed three-dimensional and set to music by Etta James, Dean Martin, and James Brown (yikes). Back in Action, well it earns its title, starring Jamie Foxx and Cameron Diaz as operatives Emily and Matt, kicking and punching and head-slamming their way to skirmish glory. It's like The Bourne Identity for couples, Mr. and Mrs. Smith without tykes attached, a better version of 2010's Killers, Diaz in Charlie's Angels mode (woot woot). "That's not why we were cool". Uh, thank you for the insight Mr. and Mrs. Reynolds. Don't clip me for I'm just the writer. 

So yeah, do I plan on recommending Back in Action? Almost. The brawling, death-defying stunt work, and car chases are modernized, streamlined, and cool. It's the scripted stuff in between that's a little dicey (and kind of stupefying to be honest). I mean why do Emily and Matt's characters feel the need to say whatever pops in their heads (improvisation overload)? And why are their kids so darn annoying and almost passive by nature? And um, why is "Action's" plot so evocative of every spy flick ever made? Finally, why does "Action" never take the time to take itself seriously, being way too tongue in cheek for its own good? Questions, questions, questions and only the pic's distributor Netflix can answer them. Oh wait, this is Netflix's veritable par for the course. Asked and answered. "Back" handed. 

Written by Jesse Burleson

Ad Vitam 2025 * * Stars

AD HOCKERY

"This peaceful little life". Car chases and killings and ransom kidnappings and balloon sky riders oh my! Peaceful my stinking butt!

So OK, what is Ad Vitam? Well it's a movie I guess and mysterious words of wisdom too. Ad vitam, yeah it means "for life". Me, I'm "for" a plot gloss as to why an FBI agent seems to have people wanting to either kill him or arrest him. Yeesh!

Anyway Ad Vitam is a slickly-made thriller, so slick in fact that it distracts you from how choppy it is from a narrative standpoint. Although directed by four-timer Rodolphe Lauga, "Ad" looks like something action monger Brian A. Miller would've done ten years ago, shiny and glossy and violent and hollow and well, pedestrian. Look for low budget, typewriter title cards, clear the area police action, and rather plodding shootouts. About the only things missing from Ad Vitam are Thomas Jane, Bruce Willis and some monotonous, cue card line readings.

As per the last paragraph, I can't really compute the actual diegesis of Ad Vitam, I just can't. The film has no wiki page anyway and that just makes everything that much more frustrating. I mean I know "Ad's" lead is the sleepwalking Guillaume Canet, a cross between the poor man's Bradley Cooper and the poor man's Patrick Dempsey. I know the film is told mostly in slogged flashbacks, with training scenes for members of GIGN's tactical unit interspersed with sudden bursts of brute force. I know there's a pregnant wife character (Stephanie Caillard as Leo) who doesn't mind harming said pregnancy slinging fists of fury. Um, I know Netflix is involved (shocker). Finally, I know Ad Vitam was shot in the country of France ("wee-ooh, wee-ooh). Now is that enough my beret-loving "Frogs?" Not for a recommendation. "Ad out". 

Written by Jesse Burleson

Blind River 2025 * * * Stars

SEE THIS LIGHT

Blind River has to do with stealth kidnappings and Mayberry mayhem and well, poky waterways too (hence the title). It fashions itself in the conch of stuff like Gone Baby Gone and Mystic River and 2014's Sand Castles, movies where young girls are abducted and families are completely shattered. In the case of "River", an unseeing woman goes on her own little crusade to find her daughter who went missing on Christmas Day. "You hold on too tight and I'm just afraid you're going to suffocate." Ugh. 

Blind River is directed by Carissa Stutzman, an unseasoned helmer who looks like a seasoned pro giving her film a somber air, an effectively ill-lit look, and a precarious tone. "River", well it was shot entirely in Mentone, Indiana, a town not far from where most of my family grew up. Yup, Blind River feels like Northern "Hoosier State" personified, a slice of Middle America, Americana if you will. You can smell the husky corn, breathe the shamba oxygen, take in that Midwestern hospitality, and taste those greasy pork tenderloin sandwiches. Believe that. 

"River" stars Annalise Basso, Steven Ogg, and Tracey Campbell and is distributed by Lifetime Television. Compared to most flicks on that long-running, basic cable channel Blind River has better acting, less camp, less soap opera operatic, and more attested production values (trust me on this one). The vehicle is a crisply edited, gravely told, whodunit or should I say, who done did it. There's even a twist at the end where we find out which tyke snatcher um, you know done did it. Add a musical score for the ages that evokes Hans Zimmer in his heyday and an Indiana locale that's rural everyman in every town and you have one of the most surprising offerings of early 2025. "Unlazy rivulet". 

Written by Jesse Burleson

Don't Die: The Man Who Wants to Live Forever 2025 * * 1/2 Stars

ALIVE HE CRIED

A millionaire named Bryan Johnson, decides by all means necessary to do whatever it takes to extend his life beyond the normal expectancy. The documentary about Johnson's extremity is aptly titled, Don't Die: The Man Who Wants to Live Forever (naturally). 

Anyway I as a critic have always favored docus, whether they be about famous people or pseudo famous people or well, dead famous people (no pun intended). With "Don't Die", we have Johnson who's somewhere in the middle. I mean I didn't know who he was until yesterday but now I'm getting an education. Bryan Johnson's got nothing but money so he can afford to take 54 pills a day and get red-light therapy and get plasma exchanges and um, inject himself via some gene therapy. Basically he spends all his time trying to prolong his esse so it's like he doesn't uh, have a life (har har). Bri, I hope it was worth it bro. "100 years is not going to be enough". Oh boy.

Vitamin B12's and discretionary income aside, Don't Die: The Man Who Wants to Live Forever is a clean, well-made, almost sterile vehicle by producer/director/cinematographer Chris Smith. There's nothing flashy, no tricks, just a look that seems borrowed and/or adopted from Alex Garland's sci-fi thriller, Ex Machina (hint, hint). 

There's interviews (mostly from Bryan and his son), a few archives, but mainly techy stuff about how Johnson's going to defy the mysterious aging process and various whatnots. Bryan Johnson, well he comes off as a little pretentious and "Don't Die" seems a little long-winded for a running time of an hour and a half (could've been more effective as a segment on 60 Minutes which has probably already happened). Still, Don't Die: The Man Who Wants to Live Forever is a rather beguiling watch. It's like the antithesis to what the late Morgan Spurlock did when he hit up good old Mickey D's two decades ago. 

Written by Jesse Burleson

Carry-On 2024 * * * Stars

"DON'T YOU CRY NO MORE"

2024's Carry-On has to do with airports, and metal detectors, and annoying commuters, and handheld luggage (hence the plain to see title). It fashions itself in the vein of stuff like Phone Booth and Panic Room and 2005's Red Eye, movies where if the protagonist doesn't do something for the antagonist, said antagonist is gonna make said protagonist's life a living nightmare. In the case of Carry-On, TSA agent Ethan Kopek (Taron Egerton) has to let a dangerous package pass through security or evil passenger Traveler (Jason Bateman) is gonna off Ethan's pregnant girlfriend. "Just relax okay". Uh, whatev dude, I'm doing the best I can. 

Carry-On, well it is directed by Jaume Collet Serra, a guy who never met a terminal and/or baggage claim he didn't like (or wanted to utilize). Serra manufactures a new spin on the whole, terrorist airfield thang, letting the chaos and tension spill mostly within the lobby as opposed to the friendly skies. As usual he turns the psychological screws and supplies the mild convolutions, occasionally throwing in a violent, three-dimensional, streamlined action sequence (in this occasion, said sequence is set to Wham's "Last Christmas"). About the only thing missing from Serra's flight plight is some NYC locales and one Liam Neeson. 

Normally funnyman and gift of gab monger Jason Bateman squeezing out a performance as a credible villain, some offhanded humor, Bateman and Egerton's Ethan going mano a mano in thuggish manner. Carry-on has these attributes but let it be known, it is not a Christmas movie (even though it takes place on Christmas Eve), just as Die Hard is not a Christmas movie (same swipe). Get over it people and embrace Red One as Yuletide fare instead! Just accept Carry-On as a thriller that just happens to intervene with those warm, day of festivity fuzzies. "Carry" conviction. 

Written by Jesse Burleson

A Complete Unknown 2024 * * * Stars

SELF PORTRAIT

From 1961 to 1965, Bob Dylan's life as a musical icon is chronicled in 2024's A Complete Unknown. "I met one man who was wounded in love". Indeed.

Anyhow most biopics about actual, famous people are recommendable because there's always a godlike performance to accompany (and sometimes overshadow) the whole kit and caboodle. In "Unknown", Timothee Chalamet completely immerses himself into character via Dylan, singing like him and talking like him and getting all his mannerisms just right. Come Oscar time circa 2025, Timmy boy might need to clear space for one of the shelves in his probably big-arse abode. He may just collect ye olde statuette come March.

Chalamet's transformation and dramatization validity aside, do I think A Complete Unknown is a masterpiece in filmmaking from usual, biographical monger James Mangold? Not completely (pun intended) but I admire Jim's rich sense of time and place, his method of generating early 60s, viewer escapism. I also dug where he put the camera, as Bob Dylan's four years of depiction feel like an effectively languid, slow burn. Production values, set design, and "cultural decade", flight(s) of fancy within "Unknown" are all top-notch. "He's not selling any alibis". No Bob's not, never.

So why am I hesitating in announcing A Complete Unknown as the best vehicle of the year. Well for starters it's edited choppily and a tad overlong, recycling Jay Cocks and Mangold's screenplay while not having much of a diegesis of its own to bounce off of. Added to that, Bob Dylan is not portrayed as the most likable dude in the world here. I mean sure Chalamet is brilliant but his persona as well as the overall conch of "Unknown" keep you at a distance, not letting you crash the veritable party. The film feels like a chronological, "peeking in" documentary and/or 141-minute folk concert when it could've delved a little deeper. Near-great "unknown". 

Written by Jesse Burleson

Gladiator II 2024 * * * Stars

AT MY SIGNAL UNLEASH WELL, YOU KNOW

The son of the late Maximus is sold to slavery to become a trained combatant via the Colosseum. That's the continual nub of 2024's Gladiator II. 

Anyway, most sequels are inferior to the original. It's almost an enigma as to why. Aliens and Godfather Part II and Wrath of Khan may be the exceptions but there it is, a lesser product that makes less money and gets the usual ribbing by those nitpicky critics. "You will be my instrument". Uh, not so fast there big guy. 

So OK, Gladiator II just happens to be the follow-up to 2000's Gladiator (naturally). "II" may be shorter (by 7 minutes) but it's bigger, and bloodier, and well, more lurid. A fight to the death against some nasty baboons, a fight to the death against some pesky sharks, a fight to the death "Mandingo" style, Denzel Washington doing an imitation-like performance of a Roman emperor with a penchant for big-arse earrings. Yeah Gladiator II is like Gladiator on steroids but that doesn't make it the superior result. "Are you not entertained?" I mean yeah but it's not what you're thinking. 

Starring Paul Mescal, Pedro Pascal, Connie Nielsen, and Washington (see last paragraph), "II" is better than most second runs because it stays faithful to the original while moving the story along as if it were the utmost form of a companion piece. Minus almost aping Gladiator's first hour in terms of plot threads and affray themes, "II" is worth at least one watch for those who consider "fear and wonder a powerful combination" (natch).  

I mean the look is the same (cloudy and blazing, sun-scorched hues), Ridley Scott's direction is still the mammoth of all canvases, and the editing is about as crisp as new $1 dollar bills. What's missing from "II" that the first Gladiator had is the stirring score of Hans Zimmer (the late Hans Zimmer), any standout speck of emotional and/or dramatic heft, and of course, the molten screen presence of one Russell Crowe (he died the first time around so what are you gonna do). Still, as a holiday-released pic with modernized, historical avail and a proclivity for brutal inhumanity, Gladiator II "fights tooth and nail".  

Written by Jesse Burleson

My Top Ten Movie Picks of 2024

1. How to Rob a Bank * * * 1/2 Stars

-How to Rob a Bank is a documentary that's entertaining enough to make you feel like you're watching pure fiction (when your obviously not). 

2. Lover, Stalker, Killer * * * 1/2 Stars

-Lover, Stalker, Killer is all so diverting, perplexed, and fresh, like some drawn-out episode of Paranormal Witness, Dateline, and/or Forensic Files.

3. Apollo 13: Survival * * * 1/2 Stars

-Apollo 13: Survival is a docu that would rather heighten the cinematic days of yore as opposed to just reinventing the Space Race hoop. 

4. A Complete Unknown * * * Stars

-Timothee Chalamet immerses himself into character as Bob Dylan in this well-made biopic about the legendary folksinger. 

4. (tie) Sixty Minutes * * * Stars

-Few films have the urgency and/or bone-crushing voyeurism of Sixty Minutes, a non-stop rinse, repeat of loud fistfights then payoff, then loud fistfights then payoff.

5. Return of the King: The Rise and Fall of Elvis Presley * * * Stars

-A tapestry of archives and probes sifted through a breezy 90 minutes as Presley's singing voice melts the airwaves like butter.

6. The Wages of Fear * * * Stars

-The Wages of Fear is The Road Warrior meets 2015's Sicario. Slick and violent and dangerous.

7. Bitconned * * * Stars

-If flicks like Boiler Room, The Wolf of Wall Street, and The Social Network were made into docus, they'd probably equal the plot line of the cocksure Bitconned. 

7. (tie) Carry-On * * * Stars

-A film that fashions a new spin on the whole, terrorist airfield thing. Streamlined tension (pun intended). 

8. Reagan * * * Stars

-A rather hard-nosed drama about the 40th president that contains a little dry jocularity, some biting satire, and some goofy self-deprecation.

9. The Menendez Brothers * * * Stars

-Director Alejandro Hartmann keeps the storytelling clean even if his narrative is a little long-winded and forcefully opinionated. His Menendez Brothers is a fascinating if not icky and sort of fallacious watch.

10. A Quiet Place: Day One * * * Stars

-Helmer Sarnoski gives A Quiet Place: Day One that compact, efficacious treatment, doing the best he can to make you feel all "end of the world"-ish as you jump from your seat on his paltry budget of $67 mil. 

Honorable Mention: Buy Now! The Shopping Conspiracy, Under Paris, Arthur the King, The Fall Guy, Transformers One, Gladiator II

And the worst....

1. Jimmy Carr: Natural Born Killer * 1/2 Stars

-Instead of "killing" the audience with his so-called, iconic abilities as a funnyman, Jimmy Carr appears more like the poor man's Ricky Gervais, hosting an X-Rated version of the Golden Globes and bombing like the empty half pints at an Irish pub.

2. Unfrosted * 1/2 Stars

-Unfrosted is labeled a comedy but couldn't be further from it. I mean just because you have four writers (which include director Jerry Seinfeld himself) penning a bunch of jokes and quips about the conch of multinational companies doesn't mean they ain't gonna flop and die in that almighty wind.

3. What Jennifer Did * 1/2 Stars

-What Jennifer Did is not so much a docu as it is a declared-in-advance malfeasance caper with a muted conclusion. "Did" more harm than good? Oh you betcha. 

4. Cat and Dog * 1/2 Stars

-Cat and Dog is a pseudo comedy I suppose and/or a harmless, slapstick action caper. This vehicle doesn't have much of a tone and it's one of those flicks where the people involved had much more fun making it than the viewer has watching it.

5. A Family Affair * 1/2 Stars

-A Family Affair is not so much a romantic comedy as it is a bipolar, dramatis personae study of three characters who'd probably be better off avoiding each other.

List compiled by Jesse Burleson